Sep 21, 2007

5 Reasons the AL East Matters

As the number of games remaining on the schedule sinks into single digits, four divisional and two wild card races are heating up.

The Mets are trying to choke away the NL East, while it seems that no one really wants the NL Central. The Padres, meanwhile, have been stealthily creeping up on the run-deficient Diamondbacks in the NL West.

But if you're like me, the race you can't keep your eyes off of is the AL East. I'm not even a Red Sox fan, but I can see the sharks circling the waters in Boston, and something needs to be done about it -- fast. Even though the loser gets the AL Wild Card as a consolation prize, the Red Sox need to be desperate for the division. Here are five reasons why:
  • Boston hasn't won a divisional title since 1995, back when the Rocket was still in town. Twelve years is a long time to go without a banner to hang from the facade.

  • The Red Sox need the momentum heading into October. None of us needs to be reminded that the World Series has been won plenty of times by a Wild Card team, including the Red Sox's wild ride in 2004. Still, it's tough to turn around a tailspin in a best of five games series.

  • The fans deserve it. After an entire season of gloating to Yankees fans, the Red Sox Nation would be shamed beyond belief if Boston didn't hold on for the division.

  • Boston has been disgraced enough in the annals of baseball. After surging to a 14.5 game lead by the end of May, the Red Sox were ready to bag the title. If Boston blows the lead, it will be the second largest lead squandered in Major League history. The Red Sox have been there before, though; 1978 anyone?

  • Someone needs to slay the Yankees. And it ain't going to be the Orioles or Devil Rays. For the last decade and a half, baseball (and the AL East, in particular) has suffered through the Yankees' reign of terror. It needs to stop, and it needs to stop this year.

So there you have it. The Red Sox need to Cowboy Up (just like in 2004), finish the season strong at home, and get it done. I think they will.

And with that, I'm out for the weekend. Have a good one.

Sep 19, 2007

Separated at Birth: Darren McFadden & Kanye West

Hat tip to Neil at The Sports Lounge for pointing this one out; I wouldn't have thought of it in a million years. McFadden (left) is an early frontrunner for the Heisman, while West is a Grammy Award winning rapper.

Putting the "School" Back in High School Sports

As high school football continues to fill the pages of Sports Illustrated and the airwaves of ESPN, some people fear that there's something getting lost in the shuffle: academics.

The result of that fear is a non-profit organization called Play it Smart, which has been created to help high school athletes keep their grades up. In 142 schools nationwide, football players have to answer to an extra "coach," whose sole purpose in life is to keep them focused on schoolwork.

Play it Smart is claiming great success since its inception in 1998. From the LA Times article:

According to the NFF, 95% of Play It Smart participants graduate from high school, compared to 85% of athletes not in the program, and 80% of its seniors enroll in either two- or four-year colleges, compared to 62% of their peers.

If the program truly teaches the students that high school is not just a place to audition for a chance to play in college -- which, let's be honest, many athletes view as a minor leagues for the NFL -- then I think it's a great idea.

Even so, I have my reservations about Play it Smart. Is it teaching the kids the importance of an education, or only how to achieve an acceptable GPA? Is anyone telling these kids that the NFL -- or even a Division I college scholarship -- isn't likely, so they'd better learn some valuable, non-athletic skills?

If Play it Smart can intervene and have a positive impact in kids' lives, more power to them. Because it their message doesn't get through, the transition from high school football star to career McDonald's man can be tough.

Sep 18, 2007

Interview with Ball Four Author, Jim Bouton

All on the Field speaks with Jim Bouton, former Yankee knuckleballer and author of the best-selling book, Ball Four. Bouton weighs in on the legacy of his book, HGH and steroids, and the future of the knuckle ball.

Q: Jim, you're famous for writing Ball Four, but you're also the inventor of Big League Chew and the author of another book, Foul Ball. What are you up to these days?

I'm the commissioner of the Vintage Baseball Federation and we staged our first annual Northeast Regional Playoffs and Vintage Baseball World Series this summer in Westfield, Mass.

So this is an old-timers league then?

Yeah, it's baseball played [with] 19th century rules, uniforms, and equipment. It's a step back in time. We create a 19th century atmosphere with costumed actors and kids selling cracker jacks with newsboy caps and suspenders.

Ball Four is one of the best selling sports books of all time, but you didn't always get favorable reactions for having written it. What has the legacy of the book become, and how are you treated by the baseball establishment today?

Ball Four was originally given bad -- harsh reviews by Major League Baseball and a few players, and mostly sports writers that were upset that I had written about things that had never been written about before in sports. And so they were sort of angry that a baseball player of all people would cross the boundary line.

But once the book came out and people realized it wasn't a bad book about baseball -- it was a good book about baseball -- it was funny, made the players more human, more likable, and turned a lot of people onto baseball. It didn't turn anybody off.

But that was years ago, when it first came out in 1970. Since then, it's been recognized as a very good book about baseball. It was selected a few years ago by the New York Public Library as one of the most important books of the century.

I've updated it three times: 1980, 1990, and 2000. (The latest edition, Ball Four: The Final Pitch, can be found at Bouton's website).

You reference "greenies" several times in the book. How extensive was their use when you played? Did everybody use them?

I don't know, but in the book I asked Don Mincher how many guys are taking Greenies. I said "Fifty percent?" And he said, "Hell, way more than that." I would probably guess maybe 60 to 70 percent.

But you have to distinguish greenies -- the peptos as they were called -- from steroids. Greenies only allowed you to play up to your ability. If you didn't get a good night's sleep, or you had a hangover, it would allow you to play up to your ability, or at least some players thought that. It did not create a different human being. It did not change your physical makeup. It did not allow you to play beyond your ability, your normal ability as steroids do and as Human Growth Hormone does.

Are you saying, then, that greenies was pretty much the only substance of that nature that was floating around at that time?

That was the only substance players took that could be called a drug in any way.

As you mentioned, these days it's HGH and steroids that are all the buzz. How do you think the game evolved to this point where no slugger or power pitcher is immune from suspicion?

Baseball got itself into this position because it has refused to have a strong drug policy, and for that I blame the Players Association. They're very short-sighted. They elevated the players' rights to privacy above their rights to good health and fair competition. The Players Association should have protected the players who were not taking the drugs; even if most of the guys wanted them, the Players Association should have protected the non-users who have to compete against the users.

It's really not fair, is it?


No, it's not, and now you've got a bunch of records that are going to be hard to break. It's unfair from two levels: first of all, it's unfair to the records that were broken and were set by guys years ago who weren't on performance enhancing drugs. And now they're going to be broken in the future by guys who aren't going to be on performance enhancing drugs because they're going to have tougher drug laws.

So you're going to have a set of records that are going to be distorted and are going to be standing for longer than they should be.

So are you in the camp, then, that would go for asterisks attached to some of those records?

Yeah. A blue ribbon panel needs to be appointed and be given a launch budget and investigate just exactly what kind of impact steroids have on batting and pitching. And also [to determine] what period of time were they prevalent, and to what extent have they affected the numbers, the records.

This would be not a punitive thing; this would be investigatory simply to establish which records are legitimate and which ones are not. And then, they need to figure out where the impact is. If it's on home runs -- for example, 40 percent increase in home runs as a result of steroids -- they need to apply those numbers to the numbers that were actually hit so that next to the actual number of home runs hit, you'd have, in parentheses, a steroid adjusted number. I call it the S.A.N. It would sit there in parentheses next to the actual number hit.

[Jim goes into more detail at this point, but you can read more of his thoughts by clicking here].

Switching gears, Tim Wakefield is the only Major League pitcher that I know of still throwing the knuckle ball. Does he represent the end of an era, or does the knuckler have staying power?

There have never been more than a few knuckle ball pitchers at any given time; never more than two or three. In some years, there's only been one, so this is not unusual to have a lone knuckle ball pitcher.

There may not be too many more, however, because the knuckle ball takes a lot of patience and you have to throw it all the time. And you have to learn it as a kid, and I don't know if kids are willing to spend that kind of time learning a knuckle ball. They've got the computer, they're skateboarding, they've got all sorts of other things they're doing. Most of the guys that I know who threw the knuckle ball did nothing but play baseball when they were kids. That's all they did, all day long. They didn't have Little League even.

The advantage of that was you didn't just play between 3:00 and 4:00 in the afternoon with the parents and uniforms; you played when the sun came up and you went home when the sun went down. You played baseball all day long. It's all you played, all summer long. You don't have that anymore in America, which is why fewer and fewer players are American-born. Most of the new guys that are coming in, the really talented ball players, are the ones that are coming from the Dominican Republic, where they play baseball like they used to play in the US.

However, I do think that the knuckle ball is uniquely suited to the Asian culture because the knuckle ball is a pitch that requires a sort of letting go. You can't control it. You can't dominate it. You have to sort of let it go. It's like a Zen philosophy almost and requires incredible patience. So I can see very easily young Asian players spending enormous hours learning and perfecting the knuckle ball. I would not be surprise if there was a wave of Japanese knuckle ball players, Chinese knuckle ball players coming in because thousands of kids there have had the patience and the time to develop this pitch.

Who do you like for this year's World Series?

I haven't been following it that closely. I generally predict teams that I'm rooting for. I'd like to see Lou Piniella's Chicago Cubs in there, because Lou and I played ball together for awhile in spring training, I know him, and he's a nice guy. From the American League, Detroit. It would be nice to see a Detroit - Chicago World Series.

Sep 17, 2007

Minus Espionage Tactics, Patriots Still Win

If you sat in a sports bar anywhere outside of New England last night, you might have heard a hissing sound, like air rushing out of an untied balloon.

When the bad guy wins, as the Patriots did against the Chargers, it can feel deflating.

There were no sideline cameras, no headset tampering, and no sign stealing this time. Just a good, old-fashioned rout.

As the spying controversy grew over the course of the week, there were those who openly wondered how New England's unfair advantage had altered the course of recent football history. Hines Ward, who isn't exactly a highly-regarded player in his own right, said he suspected foul play in 2002 and 2005 playoff games against the Patriots.

The Eagles, meanwhile, wondered if maybe they deserved the 2005 Super Bowl.

As the circus unfolded around them, though, the New England Patriots prepared to prove that they are still among the NFL elite. And given the opportunity against one of the top-rated AFC teams, the Patriots did just that.

For those of us who hoped that justice may have been somehow served, it was a disappointing outcome.

But it also confirmed the fact that with or without Bill Belichick's espionage tactics, New England has been and continues to be a premier team in the NFL. Why Belichick would feel the need to cheat to gain a competitive advantage is beyond me.

Maybe Barry Bonds could provide some insight.